Deferred compensation options for executives of tax-exempt entities are often misunderstood by those organizations who have not previously delved into them. Traditional tax-exempt organizations – think charities and non-profits – are subject not only to the deferred compensation rules of Section 409A of the tax code, but also Section 457 (though note that Section 457 does not apply to deferred compensation arrangements of churches). Section 457-subject organizations without deferred compensation experience are often under the impression that they are able to establish deferred compensation arrangements that are similar to those of for-profit entities, in that the right to deferred compensation can vest now and be taxed at a later date. When such organizations begin moving forward to put a deferred compensation arrangement place, they are often surprised to learn that Section 457 generally limits their ability do so.
The most analogous deferred compensation arrangement for tax-exempt executives compared to a traditional for-profit deferred compensation plan is what’s generally known as a Section 457(f) plan. While there are a number of differences between a Section 457(f) plan and a for-profit deferred compensation plan, the biggest is the timing of the taxation of the deferred compensation. A for-profit deferred compensation plan can be designed so that once the right to deferred compensation vests, it can be taxed (for income tax purposes) on the date that it is paid, which can be many years in the future. With a Section 457(f) plan, once the deferred compensation vests, it becomes immediately taxable, even if the plan provides for payment of the deferred compensation in a future year. Read more
https://www.employeebenefitslawblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/logo_vertical-v2.png00Benjamin Gibbonshttps://www.employeebenefitslawblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/logo_vertical-v2.pngBenjamin Gibbons2024-02-05 09:48:222024-02-05 09:48:22Deferred Compensation Arrangements for Non-Profits: What I’ve Felt, What I’ve Known, Is Not Consistent with the Code
Disputes between plan sponsors and plan service providers are not new. As with any contractual relationship, things don’t always go according to “plan” or at least, as the sponsor expects. When that happens, one of the first things sponsors (and their attorneys) will do is review the provider’s contract. Some sponsors will be surprised to find some very provider-friendly provisions, such as:
a provision specifying that the provider is permitted by the contract to act negligently (as long as the conduct does not rise to gross negligence or intentional misconduct), or
a provision indicating that the sponsor has contractually waived its right to participate in a class against the provider.
Unfortunately for sponsors, a provider’s willingness to fix an error often comes down to how much the provider wants to continue working with the sponsor on a go forward basis. Read more
https://www.employeebenefitslawblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/logo_vertical-v2.png00Kevin Selzerhttps://www.employeebenefitslawblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/logo_vertical-v2.pngKevin Selzer2024-01-26 10:33:202024-01-26 10:33:20Take the Power Back . . . Negotiating Provider Contracts for Benefit Plans
Inevitably, an employee will wake up from their holiday food coma and realize that they made a mistake in open enrollment. “But I didn’t mean to elect family coverage! My spouse is covering the kids this year!” Employers are allowed to set enrollment rules for their self-funded medical plans. One response to the employee is the hard line that the door was closed at the end of the enrollment period. But what if you want to be more flexible?
If the employee catches their mistake before the ball drops on New Year’s Eve, the IRS won’t care. But if the question comes up in January, it’s likely too late. The IRS’s rules on cafeteria plan elections don’t make any exception for mistake. Elections can only be changed if the employee has a change in status event like a divorce or new dependent. Read more
https://www.employeebenefitslawblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/logo_vertical-v2.png00Beth Nedrowhttps://www.employeebenefitslawblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/logo_vertical-v2.pngBeth Nedrow2024-01-12 10:45:212024-01-12 10:45:21A Change Would Do You Good, But Do The Section 125 Cafeteria Plan Rules Permit It?
One of the many benefits-related provisions in the Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2021 prohibits the use of “gag clauses” in group health plan agreements. Before this law, medical plan service agreements would often include provisions preventing the employer from sharing data like pricing and health plan outcomes available to another party. Hopefully employers have worked to make sure that there are no such clauses in their agreements. But there’s one more step on the compliance ladder. Beginning in 2023, plans must annually attest to their compliance with the gag clause prohibition. Read more
https://www.employeebenefitslawblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/logo_vertical-v2.png00Becky Achtenhttps://www.employeebenefitslawblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/logo_vertical-v2.pngBecky Achten2023-12-04 09:52:122023-12-04 10:33:19Signed, Sealed, Delivered … Have You Completed Your Plan’s “No Gag Clauses” Attestation?
Employers try to provide a benefits package that employees appreciate and understand. Beyond the traditional offerings like 401(k), match, medical and dental, employers often try to be responsive to employees’ requests for other programs and features they would find useful (example – fertility benefits). One of the current requests employers may be hearing from their employees is request for assistance with student loan debt. Congress has been hearing those pleas, as well, and has provided employers with two potential avenues for giving relief to their employees. Read more
https://www.employeebenefitslawblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/logo_vertical-v2.png00Beth Nedrowhttps://www.employeebenefitslawblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/logo_vertical-v2.pngBeth Nedrow2023-10-11 12:37:582023-10-11 12:37:58Don’t Know Much About History … But I Do Know How Employers Can Help Their Employees With Student Loan Debt!
The time may have come to add a welfare plan committee to your company’s governance of employee benefit plans. New legal obligations and other developments impose fiduciary risks for welfare plans similar to what already exist for retirement plans.
Most employers that sponsor a 401(k) plan or other retirement plan set up a committee to administer and oversee the plan. This is generally a best practice to ensure that the plan is properly administered in compliance with employee benefits laws and, for plans subject to the Employee Retirement Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), to have a process for following ERISA fiduciary duties. Fiduciary duties include acting prudently and in the best interests of participants, such as in overseeing service providers and monitoring plan fees. Read more
https://www.employeebenefitslawblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/logo_vertical-v2.png00Brenda Berghttps://www.employeebenefitslawblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/logo_vertical-v2.pngBrenda Berg2023-09-28 13:04:152023-09-28 13:04:15The Time Has Come, A Fact’s A Fact: Consider Adding a Welfare Plan Committee
I have heard from a couple of clients recently who have received a penalty notice from the IRS for purportedly filing a late or incomplete 2022 Form 8955-SSA (the IRS form that plan sponsors use to report terminated participants with vested benefits), despite having timely filed Form 8955-SSA earlier this summer. While initially causing some concern, the IRS recently announced that due to a programming error, the IRS’s system automatically sent out Form 8955-SSA penalty notices to those plan sponsors who had already timely filed their 2022 Form 8955-SSA. Read more
https://www.employeebenefitslawblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/logo_vertical-v2.png00Benjamin Gibbonshttps://www.employeebenefitslawblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/logo_vertical-v2.pngBenjamin Gibbons2023-09-15 09:27:212023-09-26 14:29:50Don’t Think Twice, It’s All Right to Ignore That Late Form 8955-SSA Notice
Deferred Compensation Arrangements for Non-Profits: What I’ve Felt, What I’ve Known, Is Not Consistent with the Code
/in 457(b) plans, 457(f) plans, Executive Compensation, IRSby Benjamin Gibbons
Deferred compensation options for executives of tax-exempt entities are often misunderstood by those organizations who have not previously delved into them. Traditional tax-exempt organizations – think charities and non-profits – are subject not only to the deferred compensation rules of Section 409A of the tax code, but also Section 457 (though note that Section 457 does not apply to deferred compensation arrangements of churches). Section 457-subject organizations without deferred compensation experience are often under the impression that they are able to establish deferred compensation arrangements that are similar to those of for-profit entities, in that the right to deferred compensation can vest now and be taxed at a later date. When such organizations begin moving forward to put a deferred compensation arrangement place, they are often surprised to learn that Section 457 generally limits their ability do so.
The most analogous deferred compensation arrangement for tax-exempt executives compared to a traditional for-profit deferred compensation plan is what’s generally known as a Section 457(f) plan. While there are a number of differences between a Section 457(f) plan and a for-profit deferred compensation plan, the biggest is the timing of the taxation of the deferred compensation. A for-profit deferred compensation plan can be designed so that once the right to deferred compensation vests, it can be taxed (for income tax purposes) on the date that it is paid, which can be many years in the future. With a Section 457(f) plan, once the deferred compensation vests, it becomes immediately taxable, even if the plan provides for payment of the deferred compensation in a future year. Read more
Take the Power Back . . . Negotiating Provider Contracts for Benefit Plans
/in Benefits Plan Creation, ERISA, Health & Welfare Plans, Retirement PlansBy Kevin Selzer
Disputes between plan sponsors and plan service providers are not new. As with any contractual relationship, things don’t always go according to “plan” or at least, as the sponsor expects. When that happens, one of the first things sponsors (and their attorneys) will do is review the provider’s contract. Some sponsors will be surprised to find some very provider-friendly provisions, such as:
Unfortunately for sponsors, a provider’s willingness to fix an error often comes down to how much the provider wants to continue working with the sponsor on a go forward basis. Read more
A Change Would Do You Good, But Do The Section 125 Cafeteria Plan Rules Permit It?
/in Cafeteria Plans, Fiduciary Duties, Health & Welfare Plans, IRSby Elizabeth Nedrow
Inevitably, an employee will wake up from their holiday food coma and realize that they made a mistake in open enrollment. “But I didn’t mean to elect family coverage! My spouse is covering the kids this year!” Employers are allowed to set enrollment rules for their self-funded medical plans. One response to the employee is the hard line that the door was closed at the end of the enrollment period. But what if you want to be more flexible?
If the employee catches their mistake before the ball drops on New Year’s Eve, the IRS won’t care. But if the question comes up in January, it’s likely too late. The IRS’s rules on cafeteria plan elections don’t make any exception for mistake. Elections can only be changed if the employee has a change in status event like a divorce or new dependent. Read more
Signed, Sealed, Delivered … Have You Completed Your Plan’s “No Gag Clauses” Attestation?
/in Health & Welfare Plansby Becky Achten
One of the many benefits-related provisions in the Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2021 prohibits the use of “gag clauses” in group health plan agreements. Before this law, medical plan service agreements would often include provisions preventing the employer from sharing data like pricing and health plan outcomes available to another party. Hopefully employers have worked to make sure that there are no such clauses in their agreements. But there’s one more step on the compliance ladder. Beginning in 2023, plans must annually attest to their compliance with the gag clause prohibition. Read more
Don’t Know Much About History … But I Do Know How Employers Can Help Their Employees With Student Loan Debt!
/in 401(k) Plans, Fringe Benefitsby Elizabeth Nedrow
Employers try to provide a benefits package that employees appreciate and understand. Beyond the traditional offerings like 401(k), match, medical and dental, employers often try to be responsive to employees’ requests for other programs and features they would find useful (example – fertility benefits). One of the current requests employers may be hearing from their employees is request for assistance with student loan debt. Congress has been hearing those pleas, as well, and has provided employers with two potential avenues for giving relief to their employees. Read more
The Time Has Come, A Fact’s A Fact: Consider Adding a Welfare Plan Committee
/in Cafeteria Plans, Corporate Governance in Benefits, DOL, ERISA, Fees, Fiduciary Duties, Fringe Benefits, Health & Welfare Plans, Legislation, Litigationby Brenda Berg
The time may have come to add a welfare plan committee to your company’s governance of employee benefit plans. New legal obligations and other developments impose fiduciary risks for welfare plans similar to what already exist for retirement plans.
Most employers that sponsor a 401(k) plan or other retirement plan set up a committee to administer and oversee the plan. This is generally a best practice to ensure that the plan is properly administered in compliance with employee benefits laws and, for plans subject to the Employee Retirement Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), to have a process for following ERISA fiduciary duties. Fiduciary duties include acting prudently and in the best interests of participants, such as in overseeing service providers and monitoring plan fees. Read more
Don’t Think Twice, It’s All Right to Ignore That Late Form 8955-SSA Notice
/in 401(k) Plans, IRS, Retirement Plansby Benjamin Gibbons
I have heard from a couple of clients recently who have received a penalty notice from the IRS for purportedly filing a late or incomplete 2022 Form 8955-SSA (the IRS form that plan sponsors use to report terminated participants with vested benefits), despite having timely filed Form 8955-SSA earlier this summer. While initially causing some concern, the IRS recently announced that due to a programming error, the IRS’s system automatically sent out Form 8955-SSA penalty notices to those plan sponsors who had already timely filed their 2022 Form 8955-SSA. Read more