Benefits Law Group Blog | Holland & Hart LLP
  • Home
  • hollandhart.com
  • Benefits Law Group
  • Contact
  • Click to open the search input field Click to open the search input field Search
  • Menu Menu

Ooh Baby It’s a Wild World…Your Vaccination Status: What Does HIPAA Actually Protect and Prohibit

December 7, 2021/in Health & Welfare Plans

by Leslie Thomson

Earlier this fall, the Office for Civil Rights (OCR) issued guidance to help the public understand when a business or employer can request information on an individual’s COVID-19 vaccination status without violating the HIPAA Privacy Rule. This blog addresses the impact of the HIPAA Privacy Rule only. Note there may be other federal or state laws that may apply resulting in a different conclusion.

The HIPAA Privacy Rule does not apply to employment records and generally does not regulate what information can be requested by an employer from employees as part of the terms and conditions of employment that an employer may impose on its workforce. For example, the HIPAA Privacy Rule does not prohibit an employer from requiring or requesting each workforce member to:

  • Provide documentation of their COVID-19 or flu vaccination.
  • Sign a HIPAA authorization for a covered health care provider to disclose the workforce member’s COVID-19 vaccination record to their employer.
  • Wear a mask while in the employer’s facility, on the employer’s property, or in the normal course of performing their duties at another location.

Read more

https://www.employeebenefitslawblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/logo_vertical-v2.png 0 0 admin https://www.employeebenefitslawblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/logo_vertical-v2.png admin2021-12-07 14:05:352021-12-07 14:05:35Ooh Baby It’s a Wild World…Your Vaccination Status: What Does HIPAA Actually Protect and Prohibit

I Feel Good… I Knew That I Would… Wellness Program Reminders

December 3, 2021/in Cafeteria Plans, DOL, Fiduciary Duties, Fringe Benefits, Health & Welfare Plans, Litigation

by Alex Smith

With employers considering the imposition of health plan premium surcharges on participants who are COVID unvaccinated, a recent court decision highlights the importance of complying with the HIPAA wellness program requirements.

A federal district court in Ohio recently rejected a portion of Macy’s motion to dismiss the Department of Labor’s (DOL’s) enforcement action with respect to the tobacco surcharges on health plan premiums Macy’s imposed as part of its wellness program.  In its enforcement action, the DOL focused on the lack of a reasonable alternative standard for some of the years covered by the enforcement action and the lack of retroactively refunding the surcharge to participants who earned the right to avoid the surcharge later in the plan year for certain years in which a reasonable alternative standard was made available. As background, health contingent wellness programs are required to provide a reasonable alternative standard for earning the incentive (avoiding the surcharge) under HIPAA. Read more

https://www.employeebenefitslawblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/logo_vertical-v2.png 0 0 admin https://www.employeebenefitslawblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/logo_vertical-v2.png admin2021-12-03 11:17:522021-12-03 11:17:52I Feel Good… I Knew That I Would… Wellness Program Reminders

Here I Go Again in the Plan…Treatment of Rehired Employees

November 9, 2021/in 401(k) Plans, ERISA, IRS, Retirement Plans

by Benjamin Gibbons

As a result of the current labor shortage that many employers are currently faced with, more and more companies are finding themselves rehiring former employees.  If those former employees previously participated in an employer’s 401(k) plan prior to their severance from employment, such employers should review their 401(k) plan documents to see how such rehired employees are treated under those plans. Read more

https://www.employeebenefitslawblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/logo_vertical-v2.png 0 0 admin https://www.employeebenefitslawblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/logo_vertical-v2.png admin2021-11-09 14:41:122021-11-09 14:43:34Here I Go Again in the Plan…Treatment of Rehired Employees

Easy Money…2022 IRS Limits Announced Today

November 5, 2021/in 401(k) Plans, 403(b) plans, 457(b) plans, Defined Benefit Plans, ESOPs, IRS, Retirement Plans

by Lyn Domenick

The IRS has announced the 2022 cost of living adjustments to qualified plan limits. As expected, many of the limits increased significantly compared with prior years. Below are the highlights, and our full historical chart can be found here for easy reference.

401(k), 403(b), Profit-Sharing Plans, etc.
2022 2021 2020
Annual Compensation 305,000 290,000 285,000
Elective Deferrals 20,500 19,500 19,500
Catch-up Contributions 6,500 6,500 6,500
Defined Contribution Limit 61,000 58,000 57,000
ESOP Distribution Limits 1,230,000
245,000
1,165,000
230,000
1,150,000
230,000
Defined Benefit Limit 245,000 230,000 230,000
HCE Threshold 135,000 130,000 130,000
Key Employee 200,000 185,000 185,000
457 Elective Deferrals 20,500 19,500 19,000
Taxable Wage Base 147,000 142,800 137,700
https://www.employeebenefitslawblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/logo_vertical-v2.png 0 0 admin https://www.employeebenefitslawblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/logo_vertical-v2.png admin2021-11-05 10:01:242021-11-05 10:01:24Easy Money…2022 IRS Limits Announced Today

Stronger . . . Services Agreements for Benefit Plans

October 18, 2021/in Benefits Plan Creation, ERISA, Health & Welfare Plans, Retirement Plans

By Kevin Selzer

With the exception of certain small businesses, being an employer generally means offering an array of benefits to remain competitive in the worker marketplace.  As the employer grows, typically so does the list of employee benefit plans being offered.  This naturally translates into more service providers, and for good reason.  Employers typically don’t possess the knowledge and skillset to offer these benefits in-house, and ERISA, which applies to most employee benefit arrangements, requires the plans to be administered in accordance with some of the highest standards of care under law. As a result, employers are frequently hiring and replacing service providers.

Today’s post focuses on some tips for employers in a sometimes-overlooked aspect of the process of hiring a service provider – the contract between the employer and the provider.  In concept, the service provider agreement is relatively simple – it needs to set out each party’s role and responsibility in delivering the employee benefit.  As always though, the devil is in the details.  Below are some tips for employers:

Read more

https://www.employeebenefitslawblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/logo_vertical-v2.png 0 0 admin https://www.employeebenefitslawblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/logo_vertical-v2.png admin2021-10-18 09:57:532021-10-18 09:57:53Stronger . . . Services Agreements for Benefit Plans

Oh Won’t You Stay…A Little Bit Longer…Because There’s No Need to Sign Your Distribution Form in Person

September 21, 2021/in 401(k) Plans, Defined Benefit Plans, ERISA, IRS, Retirement Plans

by Elizabeth Nedrow and Becky Achten

In June 2020, the IRS issued Notice 2020-42 providing temporary relief from the physical presence requirement for certain participant distribution and beneficiary designation elections required to be witnessed by a notary public or plan representative.  This temporary relief was scheduled to expire June 30, 2021, and now has again been extended by the IRS.

As the COVID-19 pandemic continues, the IRS issued Notice 2021-40, again extending the temporary relief through the 12-month period ending June 30, 2022, as long as the prior requirements are met.  See our January 25, 2021 blog posting for a summary of the requirements. Read more

https://www.employeebenefitslawblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/logo_vertical-v2.png 0 0 admin https://www.employeebenefitslawblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/logo_vertical-v2.png admin2021-09-21 13:59:162021-09-21 13:59:16Oh Won’t You Stay…A Little Bit Longer…Because There’s No Need to Sign Your Distribution Form in Person

This is the End: Employers Must Provide Notice of the Expiring COBRA Subsidy Period

September 13, 2021/in DOL, ERISA, Health & Welfare Plans, IRS, Legislation

by Brenda Berg

The COBRA subsidy from COVID-19 stimulus bill – The American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 (ARPA) – is nearing an end and in many cases requires employers to provide notices by September 15. The COBRA subsidy covered 100% of COBRA premiums for assistance-eligible individuals for periods of coverage beginning on or after April 1, 2021 through September 30, 2021. We previously covered the details of the subsidy in these posts: These Boots Are Made For Walking…But If You Quit, You Might Not Get the COBRA Subsidy and Lean on Me…New Guidance on Federal COBRA Subsidy. Because eligible individuals have 60 days to elect COBRA, there are still a couple months of coverage periods for which individuals may still be able to elect the subsidy. Read more

https://www.employeebenefitslawblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/logo_vertical-v2.png 0 0 admin https://www.employeebenefitslawblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/logo_vertical-v2.png admin2021-09-13 08:42:532021-09-13 08:42:53This is the End: Employers Must Provide Notice of the Expiring COBRA Subsidy Period
Page 12 of 23«‹1011121314›»

About

The Holland & Hart Benefits Law Group takes a practical and cost-effective approach to advising clients on employee benefits plan creation and administration. We help clients create and maintain a wide range of customized retirement plans, multiple employer plans, health and welfare benefit plans, non-qualified deferred compensation plans, and other forms of equity and non-equity incentive plans.

Never Miss A Post! Subscribe Now.

Enter your Email:

By providing us with your email address and other contact information, you are opting in to receive emailed marketing materials from us in accordance with our online privacy statement.

SECURE Act Articles

View our most recent articles on the SECURE Act and how it might affect you.

Recent Posts

  • Truck on Fire … Supreme Court Relaxes ERISA Pleading Standards
  • Every Little Thing … Employer Considerations as New 401(k) Lawsuit Includes Extensive Claims
  • Smoke ‘Em One By One … Navigating the Wave of Tobacco Surcharge Lawsuits
  • Everything Counts in Large Amounts…2025 IRS Limits Announced
  • Heads California, Tails Carolina… Employer Considerations Following Wave of 401(k) Forfeiture Lawsuits

Categories

Archives

Disclaimer

This publication is designed to provide general information on pertinent legal topics. The statements made are provided for educational purposes only. They do not constitute legal or financial advice nor do they necessarily reflect the views of Holland & Hart LLP or any of its attorneys other than the author. This publication is not intended to create an attorney-client relationship between you and Holland & Hart LLP. Substantive changes in the law subsequent to the date of this publication might affect the analysis or commentary. Similarly, the analysis may differ depending on the jurisdiction or circumstances. If you have specific questions as to the application of the law to your activities, you should seek the advice of your legal counsel.

Privacy Policy

View our privacy policy.

© Copyright - Holland & Hart LLP - Enfold Theme by Kriesi
Scroll to top Scroll to top Scroll to top