No Peace In Quiet … Employer Considerations As New Lawsuits Challenge Voluntary Benefits

/in , , , , , , ,

by Alex Smith

In a new wave of ERISA lawsuits, four employers were sued during the holiday season for allegedly breaching ERISA fiduciary duties regarding their voluntary benefits insurance offerings. The voluntary benefits at issue are accident insurance, critical illness insurance, cancer insurance, and hospital indemnity insurance.  The four putative class action lawsuits generally allege that the employers and their benefits brokers breached their ERISA fiduciary duties and caused the participants to pay excessive premiums because they (i) failed to engage in a prudent process when selecting the insurance offerings; (ii) failed to monitor the commissions received by the benefits brokers; and (iii) failed to monitor the loss ratios on the various insurance policies. Read more

Welcome To The Future… Fiduciary Considerations as Recent 401(k) Lawsuit Challenges Proprietary Target Date Funds

/in , , , , , , , ,

by Alex Smith

A recently filed proposed class action lawsuit against IBM’s 401(k) plan fiduciaries highlights the importance for 401(k) plan fiduciaries to carefully select and monitor 401(k) plan investment options, especially the plan’s target date fund. The lawsuit alleges that plan fiduciaries breached their fiduciary duties of prudence and loyalty by retaining several underperforming funds, including a suite of proprietary target-date and target-risk funds, and three Vanguard mutual funds. The lawsuit alleges that the underperforming funds cost plan participants $1.9 billion in returns compared to alternative funds, and the underperformance was obscured by the plan fiduciaries using custom benchmarks to monitor the proprietary target-date funds’ performance.  Read more

My Next Thirty Years… Fiduciary Considerations Following DOL Approving Lifetime Income Option as QDIA

/in , , , , , , ,

by Alex Smith

Recently, the Department of Labor (DOL) issued an advisory opinion letter to AllianceBernstein permitting the AllianceBernstein Lifetime Income Strategy program for use as a qualified default investment alternative (QDIA) in 401(k) plans. While this ruling permitting an investment fund with a lifetime income component to qualify as a QDIA is not surprising based on the DOL’s QDIA regulation, it is still the first ruling specifically approving such a fund as a QDIA. Significantly, it only applies to the AllianceBernstein offering. Read more

Beer Never Broke My Heart … Recent 401(k) Lawsuit Challenges Stable Value Fund

/in , , , , , ,

by Alex Smith

A recently filed proposed class action lawsuit against Molson Coors’ 401(k) plan fiduciaries highlights the importance for 401(k) plan fiduciaries to carefully select and continually monitor all 401(k) plan investment options, including capital preservation options. The lawsuit alleges that plan fiduciaries breached their fiduciary duties of prudence and loyalty by selecting the Fidelity stable value fund offering and retaining it in the plan, even though it was significantly riskier and provided inferior returns than comparable funds. The lawsuit emphasizes that over $200 million was invested in the plan’s Fidelity stable value fund during each year at issue. Interestingly, this lawsuit focuses solely on the plan’s stable value fund investment option. At this early stage, the court has yet to rule on the lawsuit and it is unknown whether the lawsuit has merit.

Read more

Some Beach … Fiduciary Considerations As Recordkeeper Sued For Misusing 401(k) Participant Data

/in , , , , , , ,

by Alex Smith

A proposed class action lawsuit filed against Empower last month highlights the importance for 401(k) plan fiduciaries to carefully negotiate their services agreements with recordkeepers and other services providers. The lawsuit alleges that Empower took advantage of its position as the 401(k) plans’ recordkeeper by sharing participants’ confidential financial data with an affiliate. The Empower affiliate then allegedly used questionable sales tactics to target participants with large account balances to pressure them into rolling over their funds to an investment platform with high fees and underwhelming returns. At this early stage, the court has yet to rule on the lawsuit and it is unknown whether the lawsuit has merit. Read more

I Might Be In Oklahoma But I’m Not OK … Fiduciary Considerations Following Executive Order Allowing Private Equity in 401(k)s

/in , , , , , , , ,

by Alex Smith

Last week the White House issued an executive order directing the Department of Labor (DOL) and Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to facilitate 401(k) participants’ access to alternative investments, including private equity, cryptocurrency, real estate, commodities, and infrastructure financing. This direction includes the DOL reexamining guidance regarding fiduciary duties with respect to asset allocation funds, clarifying the DOL’s position regarding alternative assets and including them in asset allocation funds, and proposing related regulations and guidance. Read more

Truck on Fire … Supreme Court Relaxes ERISA Pleading Standards

/in , , , , , , , , ,

by Alex Smith

The Supreme Court recently issued a decision regarding the pleading standards for ERISA prohibited transactions claims in a case involving Cornell’s 403(b) plan to resolve a federal circuit court split. Under the Supreme Court’s decision, plaintiffs will only need to allege that the plan engaged in a prohibited transaction. The plaintiffs will not need to also allege the absence of a prohibited transaction exemption.

The Supreme Court’s decision could have far-reaching consequences because most transactions a retirement plan enters into with a service provider—such as a recordkeeper, investment advisor, or investment manager—constitute prohibited transactions with a party-in-interest (for which a prohibited transaction exemption typically applies). Plaintiffs may now be able to file lawsuits containing prohibited transaction claims capable of surviving motions to dismiss even though the allegations are meritless or frivolous. For example, the transaction subject to a claim may clearly fit within a prohibited transaction exemption, such as making reasonable arrangements for services for a reasonable price. This could be the case even if the plaintiff’s related ERISA breach of fiduciary duty claims that are part of the lawsuit are unable to survive a motion to dismiss. Read more

Every Little Thing … Employer Considerations as New 401(k) Lawsuit Includes Extensive Claims

/in , , , , , , , , ,

by Alex Smith

A recently filed lawsuit related to Swiss Re’s 401(k) plan stands out because of the extensive assortment of allegations. These allegations against Swiss Re, its 401(k) plan fiduciaries, and the plan’s recordkeeper include:

  • the plan paid excessive recordkeeping fees;
  • the plan’s investment options, including its target date funds, underperformed;
  • some of the plan’s investment options offered lower cost share classes than the share class available in the plan;
  • the plan failed to utilize the assets in the forfeiture account;
  • the plan’s recordkeeper misused participant data to market its Roth IRAs to participants; and
  • the plan’s fiduciaries failed to monitor the recordkeeper’s misuse of participant data.

Read more

Smoke ‘Em One By One … Navigating the Wave of Tobacco Surcharge Lawsuits

/in , , , , , , ,

by Alex Smith

Over the past several months, numerous large employers and their health plan fiduciaries have faced lawsuits regarding their health plan’s tobacco surcharge. A tobacco surcharge wellness program typically charges a higher monthly premium to employees and covered dependents who smoke or otherwise use tobacco products to account for some of the higher medical costs associated with tobacco use. Tobacco users can typically avoid the surcharge by completing a smoking cessation program, regardless of whether they actually quit.

This wave of putative class action lawsuits began earlier this year even though employer health plan tobacco surcharges have been around for years and the HIPAA regulations permitting the surcharges were last updated in 2013. Since then, numerous lawsuits challenging employer health plan tobacco surcharge programs have been filed. Courts have yet to rule on the recently filed lawsuits, with the plaintiffs voluntarily dismissing one of the lawsuits prior to the court ruling on the employer’s motion to dismiss. Read more

Heads California, Tails Carolina… Employer Considerations Following Wave of 401(k) Forfeiture Lawsuits

/in , , , , , , , ,

by Alex Smith

Over the past year, numerous employers and their 401(k) plan fiduciaries have faced lawsuits regarding how forfeited employer contributions to their 401(k) plan are utilized.  This wave of lawsuits began approximately a year ago when a plaintiff’s law firm filed putative class action lawsuits raising this novel claim against multiple large employers, including Intuit, Clorox, and Thermo Fisher Scientific in California federal courts.  Since then, this claim has been included in numerous 401(k) plan lawsuits even though none of these lawsuits have reached a final judgment on the merits and only five have had decisions on motions to dismiss.

These lawsuits allege that the employer and its 401(k) plan fiduciaries breached their fiduciary duties under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended (“ERISA”), by using forfeited employer contributions to the 401(k) plan to offset future employer contributions instead of using the forfeited amounts to offset 401(k) plan expenses that were charged to participant accounts.  The plaintiff’s counsel alleges that the employer and 401(k) plan fiduciaries are violating ERISA’s fiduciary requirements to make decisions for the benefit of plan participant because the employer benefits from a reduction in its future employer contributions at the expense of plan participants who have to pay for certain expenses that are charged to their 401(k) accounts. Read more