Free Fallin’…With a Golden Parachute

/in , ,

by Benjamin Gibbons

For those who have been involved in the sale of a company, Section 280G of the Internal Revenue Code may sound familiar. Section 280G governs what the IRS considers to be “golden parachute payments” and is generally applicable when a corporation is undergoing a change in control (including both stock sales and asset sales). At a high level, Section 280G imposes on disqualified individuals a 20% excise tax on excess parachute payments paid and a corresponding loss of deduction on such payments by the corporation. Read more

No More Mister Nice Guy…No More “Good-Faith” Relief for ACA Reporting Requirements

/in ,

by Becky Achten

The good news is that the deadline to furnish individuals with the Form 1095-C or Form 1095-B reporting health care coverage in 2021 has been extended to March 2, 2022. The bad news is that the days of good-faith relief are over. You better get them right this year!

Contrary to its stance taken in Notice 2020-76, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) issued proposed regulations to permanently extend the due date for providing the Form 1095-C (applicable to large employers) and the Form 1095-B (generally applicable to insurance carriers) to participants. Employers and insurers can take advantage of the extension for the 2021 reporting season before the regulations become final. This does not, however, change the deadline for filing the forms with the IRS, which remains February 28, 2022 for paper submissions and March 31, 2022 for electronic filings. Read more

Write This Down … Participants Have to Follow the Plan’s Beneficiary Designation Procedures

/in , , , , , , , , , ,

by Elizabeth Nedrow

The principles governing how ERISA plans determine a participant’s beneficiary haven’t changed much since the country singer George Strait sang “Write this down” in 1999. In short, the participant has to write it down … on the forms and following the procedures established by the plan.

Recently we’ve seen several examples of family members of deceased employees who are surprised by the plan’s record of who was designated as beneficiary. They have tried to argue that the deceased employee’s will should be allowed to designate a beneficiary, or that the plan should look to state laws regarding estates. However, the courts have clearly established that those extraneous sources do not affect the plan’s process. (Most famous are the U.S. Supreme Court’s 2001 Egelhoff decision, and its 2009 Kennedy v. DuPont decision.) Read more

What About Now? – 83(b) Tax Rules Applicable to Early Exercise of Stock Options

/in , ,

by Bret F. Busacker

Some years ago, I published an article on the importance of understanding the tax rules applicable to equity grants, with a particular focus on being aware of the timing rules for filing an 83(b) election and the importance of making timely elections (available here).

A reader of that 83(b) article approached me recently looking for guidance on when an individual may make an 83(b) election with respect to a stock option.  The question was simple – do you make the 83(b) election within 30 days of the grant of the option or within 30 days of exercise of the option? Read more

Here I Go Again in the Plan…Treatment of Rehired Employees

/in , , ,

by Benjamin Gibbons

As a result of the current labor shortage that many employers are currently faced with, more and more companies are finding themselves rehiring former employees.  If those former employees previously participated in an employer’s 401(k) plan prior to their severance from employment, such employers should review their 401(k) plan documents to see how such rehired employees are treated under those plans. Read more

Easy Money…2022 IRS Limits Announced Today

/in , , , , , ,

by Lyn Domenick

The IRS has announced the 2022 cost of living adjustments to qualified plan limits. As expected, many of the limits increased significantly compared with prior years. Below are the highlights, and our full historical chart can be found here for easy reference.

401(k), 403(b), Profit-Sharing Plans, etc.
2022 2021 2020
Annual Compensation 305,000 290,000 285,000
Elective Deferrals 20,500 19,500 19,500
Catch-up Contributions 6,500 6,500 6,500
Defined Contribution Limit 61,000 58,000 57,000
ESOP Distribution Limits 1,230,000
245,000		 1,165,000
230,000		 1,150,000
230,000
Defined Benefit Limit 245,000 230,000 230,000
HCE Threshold 135,000 130,000 130,000
Key Employee 200,000 185,000 185,000
457 Elective Deferrals 20,500 19,500 19,000
Taxable Wage Base 147,000 142,800 137,700

Oh Won’t You Stay…A Little Bit Longer…Because There’s No Need to Sign Your Distribution Form in Person

/in , , , ,

by Elizabeth Nedrow and Becky Achten

In June 2020, the IRS issued Notice 2020-42 providing temporary relief from the physical presence requirement for certain participant distribution and beneficiary designation elections required to be witnessed by a notary public or plan representative.  This temporary relief was scheduled to expire June 30, 2021, and now has again been extended by the IRS.

As the COVID-19 pandemic continues, the IRS issued Notice 2021-40, again extending the temporary relief through the 12-month period ending June 30, 2022, as long as the prior requirements are met.  See our January 25, 2021 blog posting for a summary of the requirements. Read more

This is the End: Employers Must Provide Notice of the Expiring COBRA Subsidy Period

/in , , , ,

by Brenda Berg

The COBRA subsidy from COVID-19 stimulus bill – The American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 (ARPA) – is nearing an end and in many cases requires employers to provide notices by September 15. The COBRA subsidy covered 100% of COBRA premiums for assistance-eligible individuals for periods of coverage beginning on or after April 1, 2021 through September 30, 2021. We previously covered the details of the subsidy in these posts: These Boots Are Made For Walking…But If You Quit, You Might Not Get the COBRA Subsidy and Lean on Me…New Guidance on Federal COBRA Subsidy. Because eligible individuals have 60 days to elect COBRA, there are still a couple months of coverage periods for which individuals may still be able to elect the subsidy. Read more

Here Comes the Sun: The DOL Intends to Shine the Light on Mental Health Parity

/in , , , , , , , , , ,

by Bret F. Busacker

We previously blogged about the new Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act (MHPAEA) reporting and disclosure requirements established by the Consolidated Appropriation Act, 2021 (CAA).

As a refresher, employers and carriers that sponsor group health plans are now required to provide upon request a full analysis of the process followed by the plan in establishing non-quantitative treatment limitations (NQTLs) for the plan and the impact these NQTL’s have on mental health and substance use disorder (MH/SUD) benefits provided by the plan.  This disclosure requirement went into effect on February 10, 2021.

The DOL has recently signaled its intent to focus on MHPAEA issues in filing suit against United Healthcare Insurance Company (“UHIC”) and United Behavioral Health (“UBH”).   Read more

I Can’t Go For That, No Balance Billing

/in , , ,

by Leslie Thomson

The Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2021 (“CAA”) established, among other things, new protections from surprise billing and excessive cost-sharing for consumers receiving health care items and services (“No Surprises Act”).

Most group health plans and health insurance issuers that offer group or individual health insurance coverage have a network of providers and health care facilities that agree to accept a specific payment amount for their services. Providers and facilities that are not part of a plan’s or issuer’s network usually charge higher amounts than the in-network providers and facilities. Group health plans and issuers typically do not cover the entire out-of-network costs, leaving the individual with higher costs than if they had been seen by an in-network provider. In many cases, the out-of-network provider may bill the individual for the difference between the billed charge and the amount paid by their plan or insurance, unless prohibited by state law (known as “balance billing”). Read more